The Appalachian | Archives | 2000-2001

This Issue: News | Sports | Opinion | Entertainment
The Appalachian - 262-6233
Boone, NC 28608
Oct 31, 2000

Return to Current Issue

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

News

Land-use regulations debate adds fuel to local campaign fire

U.C. debate centers around partying, safety


Tuition increase necessary for ASU to keep pace in system

Robyn Dailey - Chancellor/Advancement Beat

Leaders at Appalachian State University are proposing a campus-based tuition raise for fall 2001. C

hancellor Francis T. Borkowski said that they have tentatively laid out a $100 per semester increase.

"Regrettably Ð and I mean that Ð tuition is increasing all over the country. Philosophically, I'm opposed to it. I think it's the public's responsibility to provide education," Borkowski said.

He argues, however, that inadequate resources such as equipment, facilities and libraries can't restrain the university. Borkowski said that the amount is what he thinks the students can handle.

When asked his opinion of the tuition increase, sophomore Doug Brown said, "Two thumbs up to (a) tuition raise."

Freshman Leslie Haynes, however, said, "I don't want a tuition raise because it's just more money. And who wants to pay more money?"

"We really haven't decided (about the tuition increase) at this point. There have been discussions about different possibilities (involving the increase)," Jane Helm, vice chancellor for business affairs, said.

Helm said that there have been discussions about the increase, but no consensus has been reached. They still have to decide what the exact amount will be and how to use the money.

Over the past three years, five schools in the University of North Carolina system have induced campus-based increases, according to Helm.

This is in addition to the statewide board of governorsÕ increase that is required by all public higher-education schools yearly. The board is proposing a 4% increase for fall 2001, which means that there is a mandatory $40 increase in tuition for next year.

Campus-based increases are imposed by individual schools to help support what is needed, said Helm.

Administration feels that in order to stay at the top of North Carolina's universities, we must increase the tuition.

Helm said, "If we don't do it and others do, we simply won't have the resources they have."

She also said that tentatively the money would be used for technology, faculty salaries and financial aid. Campus-based increases are bound to certain regulations, one of which is that students who are on a need-based financial aid will be held harmless in the raise. Helm said that financial aid would reimburse the student for the increase.

The administration began talking about the increase last year when other schools were invoking an expansion, but the university decided that they wanted to wait another year, according to Helm.

"We want to make sure that we offer our students the best education possible," said Helm.

Freshman Jackie Strickland said, "I think that if it's used for technology and financial aid or other instances where the money is used for student resources then it's okay, but if itÕs for faculty raises, I think that for the job they do now, they get paid enough.Ó

Ryan Bolick, Student Government Association (SGA) president, said that compared to Appalachian StateÕs peer groups, "Faculty salaries at Appalachian State University are below average."

The school wants to raise salaries to be in the top 25% of faculty pay so that the university can attract more professors and keep the ones they've got, said Bolick.

Bolick said that no percentages have been set forth as to what money goes where, but that it has been very vague as to what technology the money will be used for.

"SGA has not taken a stand for or against the tuition increase yet," said Bolick.

He said that they are waiting to take a stand until after they have gotten feedback and opinions from students about the possible increase.

SGA is currently working with possible options that students can present to the board of trustees about their concerns and stipulations on the increase.

Student Government is expected to pass a piece of legislation on Tuesday which outlines guidelines for the tuition increase for the administration to follow.

Bolick said that it will more than likely be backing up the guidelines set forth by the board of governors. The ruling for the increase will probably be passed by the middle of November, he said. Bolick also said that the State of North Carolina feels that students are a never-depleting source of wealth and is looking to students to bear the burden of the University of North Carolina system.

He said that a campus-based tuition increase has never been done before in history and that students should not be responsible for them now.

The SGA president said that the North Carolina Constitution says that public, higher education should be free of charge, and therefore they should not depend on the student body to pay for every update that the universities need.

Bolick said, "I'm a big believer that we should follow the constitution regardless of the socioeconomic status of its residents."

The SGA is looking for input so that the students can push for what they want out of the tuition increase.

Bolick said that SGA is looking at the needs of the university and how those needs would be served by the tuition increase. They also are looking to see if it is in the students' best interests to have the increase.

Freshman Melinda Norris said, "I think it's a good thing because it's not such a drastic increase. This way the school can provide better services for the students."


Land-use regulations debate adds fuel to local campaign fire

Catherine Quill - Business Affairs Beat

In this year's local elections, land-use regulation is considered a vital factor in determining the future of Watauga County and is a heated issue being debated by the county commissioner candidates.

Currently, there are land use ordinances in effect for Watauga County dealing with grading, erosion and sediment control, and subdivision development. While some candidates feel that the current regulations will be sufficient after improvements, others feel that the county needs additional regulations to protect the area from further development.

According to District Two Democratic candidate Dennis Grady, "Land use regulation, by state law, requires that there be a zoning ordinance. I'd be in favor of more resistant zoning in urban areas."

Grady continued to say he would support land use regulations on US-321, US-421 and US-105 and on community councils to determine specific zones, as they have already done in Cove Creek and Valle Crucis.

He added that land use regulations are not necessary in the rural areas of the county because they are not threatened by development.

District Two Republican candidate James Coffey said, "We've got to look at our growth. It can better the county if we use the ordinances we've already got. By improving the ones we have, we can continue to enforce the ordinances we have."

Coffey believes the current ordinances will be effective with various amendments added to them.

District Five Republican candidate Denny Norris said, "I don't support county wide zoning because I've seen it in Boone, and I don't think they work very well. I think there's a lot better options than trying to tell people what to do with their land. I believe in the people making the right decisions."

According to District Five Democratic candidate Pat Wilkie, "I believe that the heritage, character and economy of Watauga County are at risk unless county government takes steps to implement sensible land use regulations. I support effective, fair land use regulations and stronger enforcement of the ordinances we already have in place.

"I also believe we need to work on our current infrastructure. I will work towards a requirement for environmental impact statements for major development projects; an intense water quality monitoring program; and an emphasis away from slope building."

In the guidelines for developing erosion and sediment-control plans for Watauga County, the introduction states that grading streets and roads in the mountain areas of North Carolina is responsible for producing extensive amounts of sediment when erosion control measures are not in place. This leads to irreversible damage to land, streams and lakes.

The ordinance requires that an erosion control plan be prepared where one-half acre or more is disturbed by grading, which also applies to all subdivision roads and any land disturbing activity which causes off-site erosion damage regardless of acreage.

 

 

 


Rankin Science: A state of disrepair

John T. Bennett - Associate Editor

When Dr. Vicki Martin, chairperson of the department of biology, returned to her native North Carolina after 16 years at the University of Notre Dame, she thought she would be taking the helm of a department that dealt with the science of life.

Instead, Martin inherited a department that has been forced to master the science of making the best of a bad situation.

If voters approve a $3.1 billion higher-education bond referendum on Nov. 7, the Rankin Science building, considered by many to be the Achilles heel of the Appalachian State University campus, would undergo a major overhaul.

The bond would generate some $82.3 million for Appalachian State for construction and renovation projects, with $11.2 million tagged for a comprehensive renovation of the 40-year-old science building.

Rankin was built in two stages, with the older of the two wings being constructed in the 1960s, and its sister wing a decade later.

Most of the renovation work would take place in the older wing, but Martin feels that the $11.2 million amount that would be generated if voters approve the bond would not be enough to bring that portion of Rankin up to acceptable standards.

"You cannot renovate that old wing to bring it up to codes that are acceptable for a biology department," Martin said.

According to Martin, conditions in the facility have degenerated to the point that the safety of students and faculty is in jeopardy.

"In my estimate, (Rankin Science) is the worst building on this campus. It is unsafe, and in a science laboratory, if the lab is unsafe, then that could have serious consequences for the students and the faculty working there," Martin said.

Martin's main concerns are the current state of the ventilation systems in certain laboratories, table tops that have become corroded by spilled chemicals over years of use, faulty windows, and the use of unsafe desktop outlets that serve a triple-function as sources for lighting, gas, and electricity during lab projects.

"The bench tops are not acceptable in today's teaching realm of biology. All of that needs to be ripped out, and the labs need to be brought up to code," Martin said.

"The labs are not functional in a modern, scientific world." Along with those problems, Martin also pointed to the sporadic nature of the building's heating system, which often fails, forcing students to wear heavy coats and gloves during the frigid winter months.

On the opposite side of the spectrum, Martin said students have lost consciousness during the warmer months due to excessive heat inside Rankin, which has no central air conditioning unit.

Due to a faulty heating system, students who attend classes in the Rankin Science Building often are forced to wear heavy coats to stay warm.

 

Martin stressed the need to make improvements to the facility due to the large percentage of Appalachian students who complete their required general science courses by taking classes in one of the three departments that are housed in Rankin ScienceÑbiology, geology, and geography and planning.

Failure to pass the $3.1 billion bond issue would paint a disturbing picture of how North Carolinians feel about the state's higher education system, according to Martin.

"If the bond fails É they [the voters] are sending a message that they donÕt have the concerns about the quality of education that is offered in the UNC system," Martin said.

THE RIGHT KIND OF SPACE

While Martin's concerns regarding Rankin Science revolved primarily around safety issues, other faculty members pointed to the lack of space available in the building as being the number one problem that would be alleviated by renovations that would be made possible by the bond.

According to Dr. Howard Neufeld, professor of biology, Rankin Science in its current state does not measure up to the requirements created by ever-increasing enrollment in biology courses.

Neufeld also said that in many situations, the space assigned for laboratory assignments is not always what he deemed "the right space."

Conducting a biology research lab in a room that was originally designed as a chemistry lab hinders the effectiveness of the space to provide a proper learning environment, according to Neufeld.

"[A lot of the rooms] are designed for other areas, so we're [the biology department] just making do with what we have," Neufeld said.

Neufeld said that while the funds that would be generated by the bond are "absolutely necessary," he was steadfast in his belief that the Appalachian administration should undertake the Rankin Science renovation before any other if the bond is approved Nov. 7.

"We've been told we're the number one priority for the last five years, if we are the number one priority, we ought to be acted upon first," Neufeld said.

Along with the need for improvements in the sphere of adequate space, Dr. Fred Webb, professor of geology, said the key to improving the bleak situation that currently looms over Rankin Science is better maintenance and renovation over time.

"As far as soundness is concerned, it [Rankin Science] is probably a pretty sound building. It just needs a lot of internal upgrading," Webb said.

"By taking an exterior and over the years changing the layout of the inside is basically what we are going to have to do [in the future],"

Webb said. "European universities seem to get along pretty well with old buildings." Webb said he has been in European higher education facilities that are over 800 years old, but have undergone renovations as education needs have evolved, allowing the structures to remain intact while keeping the educational needs of students paramount.

"If we renovate [Rankin Science], we can be perfectly handy for another 20 years," Webb said.


U.C. debate centers around partying, safety

Officials claim guests are to blame for problems, not residents

Sarha Sparks -Police Beat

A group of police officers, students, parents and other representatives gathered in 104 Whitener Hall for the October Crime Awareness Committee meeting to discuss campus concerns.

The main topic of discussion at the Oct. 25 meeting was the new student-housing development, University Courtyard, which opened for the 2000-2001 school year on Aug. 10.

The eight-building development houses 768 students, providing a number of safety and luxury services such as security alarms and workout facilities.

The Courtyard provides ideal housing for many college students, said Connie Pack, district manager for Ambling Management Company.

Chief Bill Post of the Boone Police Department agreed that many students view the apartments as perfect living quarters, but pointed out that the Courtyard started the year with some trouble.

Post reported that the Boone Police received 280 calls from University Courtyard from Aug. 10 to Oct. 24.

A majority of the calls were noise complaints made by other residents. Five of the calls were for minor assaults, nine were vandalism, and 24 were drug or alcohol violations. The rest of the 80 calls were for miscellaneous violations, said Post.

One of the main concerns of both the police and the Ambling representatives is that most of the problems at the apartment complex have not been caused by residents, but rather by guests, said Pack.

Pack and site manager Joy Rogers have addressed this issue by discussing the formation of a student committee to handle issues and complaints. Rogers feels that the residents are the most appropriate people to deal with concerns, because the residents have to live with the concerns on a daily basis.

Another concern brought up at the meeting was that there are unauthorized students living in the complex. According to Craig Freer, director of student affairs for the Appalachian State University Student Government Association, there are several Lees-McRae students living at University Courtyard.

Pack said that there were only three non-Appalachian State students (all from Caldwell Community College) authorized to live at the apartment complex. Rogers planned to look into the matter.

Freer also expressed concern that some students at the complex were confused about rules concerning drinking in the apartments. Freer said that students complained of confrontations with the police leading to drinking tickets for public drunkeness when the 21-and-older students were drinking on their own balconies.

Captain Curtis Main of the Boone Police Department confirmed that there was one such incident where an inexperienced officer mistakingly wrote drinking tickets to of-age residents, but assured Freer that the matter had been corrected.

Pack encouraged residents to be cautious about the activities within their apartment. Drugs were found in one apartment by a maintenance man, which could have led to drug violations for all of the roommates. No arrests were made in connection with the incident, but the roommates were split up and one moved out of the complex.

Pack and Rogers pointed out that there are strict drinking rules, such as no kegs allowed and no underage drinking or the owner of the apartment will be held responsible. The rules are outlined on pages six and seven of the lease, said Pack.

Pack laughed that Rogers already has a confiscated keg in her office that they have to dispose of because a resident broke the rules. Pack said the resident will not be laughing, though, because they have to pay a fine for the violation.

The Boone Police and the Ambling representatives both said that the weekend activities at University Courtyard have calmed down greatly in the past few weeks. Pack said, "We always have problems with overactive student partying in a new complex such as this one, but I have been very impressed by how quickly these students have settled down and gotten under control."

To help maintain control at the complex, there is an on-site police officer, Officer Fred Carrero, as well as Rogers and other staff members that live scattered throughout the buildings.

The latest concern at the complex is not the amount of party activity, but rather the safety of the residents as they try to exit the apartment parking lot, said Pack. There have been two accidents already as residents try to turn out of the complex, causing the Ambling representatives great concern.

Pack said they have spoken with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), only to discover there must to be seven traffic accidents at the location before the DMV will address the issue.

Students and parents of residents that are concerned about the traffic issue should call the DMV to make complaints.


 

 

 

Return to The Appalachian