COMMENTARY
America
loves Hannibal -- or Sir Anthony?
James Nix
For three straight
weekends now, "Hannibal" has dominated the box office
and has grossed $128.5 million in only 17 days.
As the sequel
to the Academy Award winning "Silence of the Lambs,Ó I was
not shocked when it sold out on its opening night here in Boone.
What I am surprised
about is that it continues to rule the box office.
I am a big
fan of Thomas Harris, the guy who wrote the book, and I have read
each of his books pertaining to Hannibal Lector, so I feel I have
acquired some sort of connection with the doctor.
I do not want
to critique the movie right now, but I have to say I was really
disappointed with Julianne Moore's performance as Clarice Starling.
I really wish
that Jodie Foster wasn't so greedy, and had taken the part. She
left some big shoes to fill after "Silence" and I'm not
sure if anyone could have done it.
The movie in
general was also a disappointment to me. Sir Anthony Hopkins did
a wonderful job as Dr. Lector, but that wasn't enough.
I don't think
I am alone on this one either; I have read many reviews on the movie
that share my same opinion.
With that said,
I'm amazed it has done as well as it has. I expected it to drop
in the box office some by now.
Granted, there
is not much out in the theaters now, except "Crouching Tiger,
Hidden Dragon," which is the best movie I've seen in a while,
and a few others.
There is only
one conclusion I can come to on the success of this serial-killer
flick.
Everyone loves
Hannibal Lector.
Well, Anthony
Hopkins' portrayal of him, that is. I have not seen many people
rushing out to watch "Manhunter," the 1986 adaptation
of Harris' book "Red Dragon," which is the first film
featuring the good doctor, played by Brian Cox.
There is just
something about Hopkins that brought Lector to life and earned him
an Oscar back in 1991.
I will not deny
that Hopkins is a great actor. He would not have been knighted if
he was not, but I have yet to see him in anything that compares
to his role as Lector.
I was watching
"The Mask of ZorroÓ the other night and could not help but
want Hopkins' character to eat Antonio Banderas' liver.
A recent Godsmack
song, "Vampires," depicts our fascination with the undead
bloodsuckers.
I think it
is the same thing with Hannibal the Cannibal. Americans are fascinated
with the senseless madness of one man wearing another man's face
to escape police custody.
This same fascination
of ours needed to see Lector feed someone part of his own brain
to be satisfied.
No other fictional
serial-killer has been able to satisfy our lust for violence like
Lector. No other actor has been able to pull it off like Sir Hopkins
and I do not think another one could.
Our
Perspective ...
State's
low-bid policy produces low quality
According
to Appalachian State University officials, a plan has been formulated
to correct the problems surrounding the George M. Holmes Convocation
Center roof.
A
special insulation will be installed, allowing any water that penetrates
the roof to be diverted to drains inside the multimillion-dollar
facility.
Numerous problems have plagued the roof since the building opened
Nov. 17, including damage to the basketball floor prior to the men's
basketball contest against University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill. The leasks also caused the relocation of several women's basketball
games.
To
combat this problem during the recently completed men's and women's
basketball schedule, officials placed several canopies and large
trash cans in the Holmes Center rafters to prevent water from again
damaging the basketball floor or annoying spectators.
Dr. Clyde Robbins, director of Design and Construction, was also
quick to point out the university is not responsible for the leaky
roof. Robbins also said the university will not use its funds to
conduct the repairs, but will withhold funds originally earmarked
for the main contractor of the project, Metric Constructors. While
Robbins made the university's view on the leaky roof saga clear
in Tuesday's edition of The Appalachian, we feel the heart of this
problem lies in state policy.
Under
North Carolina law, all state projects must be awarded to the construction
company that puts in the lowest bid, a move designed to keep costs
as low as possible. Robbins confirmed Tuesday that the Holmes Center
bids were taken on a low-bid basis.
"We
expect to get what we pay for," Robbins said in Tuesday's lead
story.
Robbins
and university officials did indeed get what Appalachian State paid
for: a low-bid quality facility. Evidence of the flaw of this policy
can be seen in the condition of many of North Carolina's major highways.
It seems by the time a highway project such as Interstate 85 south
of Charlotte or Interstate 77 north of Statesville reaches its conclusion,
crews return to the original starting point to repair large sections.
The
same problem has surfaced with the Holmes Center.
Given the track record of low-bid projects across the state coupled
with the long list of construction projects Appalachian is slated
to undertake in the next decade, we are forced to ask a commonsensical
question of state legislators:
Why not foot the bill for quality work that will be completed correctly
the first time?
|