Our
Perspective ...
Are
we really safe?
CAP
program needs reform
Security on
the Appalachian State University campus is often an overlooked subject,
even when it comes to residence halls. The recent security breach
in Doughton Hall during the early morning hours of Feb. 15 has led
us to question the effectiveness of the current Community Action
Patrol (CAP) program which oversees security from midnight to 5
a.m. in residence halls.
According to
the Appalachian State University Police Department, a pair of female
students reported three males harassing women as they entered Doughton
Residence Hall on the night in question. The police have received
several calls since, all reporting the same men returning to Doughton
Hall.
The official
Residence Life page on the univeristy Web site states CAP is required
"to enforce university and residence hall policies so Residence
Life may provide a satisfactory living environment while meeting
the safety and security needs of Appalachian State University students.
"Other
CAP duties include checking student identification cards and providing
support to resident assistants and resident directors in emergency
situations."
The security
of a building is largely a part of those who live in it; however,
the university has a system already set up to handle situations.
Why did that
system fail Feb. 15? Thus far no university official has been willing
to answer that question or return our phone calls. The few ASU employees
who would go on record merely told The Appalachian "no comment.
We question this wide-spread silence strenuously.
While the university
had clear intentions of ensuring the safety of student-residents
when the CAP program began, we feel the events of Feb. 15 clearly
show the program is flawed.
How can students
truly remain safe if CAP employees who are responsible for ensuring
only residents and their guests enter residence halls during the
evening and early morning hours fail to carry out their jobs?
Official university
policy states each student-resident is also accountable for the
security of his or her respective resident hall.
We agree with
this university policy, but must also point out the CAP system was
initiated because residents cannot be both successful full-time
students and full-time security guards.
We feel if the
university is truly concerned with the safety of students who reside
in campus housing, a thorough investigation of the events in Doughton
Hall Feb. 15 as well as a comprehensive assessment of the CAP program
should be completed by Appalachian State University officials, and
a report to the campus community issued immediately.
COMMENTARY
Message
to Bush: Keep Planned Parenthood
Elizabeth
Frye
Usually
I avoid writing opinion pieces like the plague. The last opinion
article I wrote was about how apathetic I have found myself to be
lately.
When my editor asks which two writers are going to write the edition's
opinion pieces, I always pretend to become incredibly fascinated
with the floor.
This
past Thursday, however, I actually volunteered to write an opinion
article because for once I have something about which I feel very
strongly and wish to discuss. I would like to share my opinion about
this particular topic with the readers of The Appalachian.
I heard recently that President George W. Bush is proposing a plan
that cuts funding to Planned Parenthood, an organization that provides
help to sexually active individuals who are uninsured or cannot
see their regular doctor for one reason or the other.
Many
young women who want to keep their sexual activity a secret go to
Planned Parenthood to get on birth control, obtain other methods
of contraceptives or to get tested for pregnancy. Appointments and
medications are given reduced rates to encourage all sexually active
people to be assisted by Planned Parenthood.
Bush wants to take funding away from Planned Parenthood because
the organization offers abortion services to its patients.
A
woman considering abortion can be referred to an abortion clinic
by doctors at Planned Parenthood, and in very special cases the
"morning-afterÓ pill is given to patients.
I understand that Bush disagrees with abortion, but it is legal
to have one. One can almost reason that cutting the funding of Planned
Parenthood encourages abortion because people will not have the
same accessibility to contraceptives.
Yes,
the unavailability of birth-control methods may keep a few people
from having sex, but for everyone else who chooses to have sex anyway,
the risk of pregnancy exists.
The solution to unwanted pregnancy for some people is abortion.
In such cases, Bush's plan to rid the country of abortion backfires.
Bush
supports abstinence education over the existence of such clinics
as Planned Parenthood.
I am all for abstinence education, but the fact remains that some
people will choose to have premarital sex.
Why can't abstinence education and clinics, like Planned Parenthood,
coexist?
Taking away Planned Parenthood, in my opinion, does not promote
abstinence but instead encourages disease and unwanted pregnancy.
Planned
Parenthood offers STD testing and counseling along with all the
other services mentioned, and thereby helps people to take care
of themselves.
I
am infuriated by the fact that Bush wants to take away money from
Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood is a good organization that
aids many people.
Maybe
Bush wants to impose his morals on the country, but he cannot change
everyone.
People
will have premarital sex and will need to turn to places like Planned
Parenthood to be responsible for their choices.
|