Our
Perspective ...
Student vote
on Board of Governors long over due
The
Appalachian State University Board of Trustees (BOT) sent a message
to state lawmakers by joining the trustees of five other University
of North Carolina System institutions in calling for a student vote
on the system's Board of Governors.
The
Appalachian trustees followed UNC-Chapel Hill, North Carolina State
University, UNC-Greensboro and Western Carolina University by approving
a student-initiated resolution in March.
The
president of the UNC Association of Student Governments currently
has a seat on the BOG, but only as an ex-officio member armed with
no voting privileges. Given the fact the enrollment of all 16 UNC
System institutions exceeds 163,000 students, we feel a student
vote is sorely needed.
We
commend the trustees of each respective institution for supporting
the collective voice of all UNC System students.
Students have a first-hand perspective of the results the policies
and mandates handed down by the 32 voting members of the BOG have
on a campus and its student body, yet are given only one ex officio
seat on that same body.
This
-- or any -- state law that essentially ignores the collective voice
of the citizenry concerns us. In this case the 163,000 UNC System
students make up the ignored group.
Students
should have a voting representative among the ranks of the BOG who
can relate to the realities of modern-day student life, something
that can only truly be achieved by changing state law to insert
a student representative as the board's 33rd voting member.
To do this, the aforementioned message must become louder and more
far-reaching.
Just
as we tip our hat to the five schools that have already given their
support to this student-initiated resolution, we challenge the remaining
11 to join their UNC System brethren in calling for this change.
We also hope the North Carolina General Assembly will take notice
of this student-led resolution -- complete with the backing of five
boards of trustees -- and begin to explore the feasibility of altering
this state law.
COMMENTARY
Take
the initiative, make a contribution
Catherine
Quill
As a communication
major, I have spent plenty of class time with aspiring journalists
and other students who show no mercy when criticizing the content
of The Appalachian.
Of course,
they only do that when they actually take the time to pick up an
issue of the paper. I think some people have been here for four
years and have no idea that our campus has its own publication.
When we see
problems with something and complain, it is our responsibility to
take action and try to remedy the situation. I listen to the number
of students who express concerns with The Appalachian, and I compare
this to the number of applications or phone calls we receive from
prospective writers, copy editors, production personnel and photographers.
The numbers
do not match up.
For those who
are required at least two hours of a mass communication activity,
what would make more sense than to work for a newspaper that is
conveniently located in Plemmons Student Union and deals with issues
especially unique to he Appalachian State University community?
Working with
a small staff, every story idea is appreciated. You can share your
"inside scoop" and enlighten others with your information.
We also love when writers volunteer to write commentaries on national,
local or campus issues when they feel the need to express their
thoughts or ideas.
If you have
something to say, this is your chance to say it.
I should not
need to bother to say that one key to landing a good job (especially
for journalists) is experience, and I probably do not need to mention
how a position with a campus newspaper looks excellent on a resume.
But I'll remind
you anyway.
When I began
reading The Appalachian as a sophomore, I was guilty of criticizing
some of the coverage.
I would wonder
why some issues did not receive coverage or I would question the
writing styles of some reporters. The difference, though, is that
I took the initiative to apply for a position as a writer.
As I read The
Appalachian, story ideas would pop into my mind, and when I started
writing last semester, I knew what I wanted to try to achieve.
Most people
would agree that those who whine about elected government officials
but do not bother to cast a vote do not have the right to complain.
I agree with
this notion wholeheartedly, and extend it to apply to those who
know they have something to offer The Appalachian but selfishly
do nothing about it, while continuing to disagree with just about
every story that runs.
We are already
accepting applications for next year, and I am hoping that everyone
who thinks they can make a contribution to the quality of The Appalachian
will actually do something about it.
I have heard
people say that our paper is guilty of "sloppy journalism."
Although I completely disagree with this, I do believe the irresponsible
journalists are those who will not commit to sharing their abilities
with the university.
|