Oct. 14, 2003 Online Since 1996 Vol 78 No. 14
The Appalachian | Letters
Stadium trashed
To the Editor:
    I was just writing in regards to the huge mess leftover in stadium parking lot after this weekend's Homecoming football game. I traveled down to the market, one of my roommates and I, on Sunday evening. I was horrified by all the full trash bags and bottles left in the parking lot. I could barely find a decent parking spot, either I had to park on top of a bag of trash or in a pot hole. I could not understand why there was so much trash left over. I know that parking lot is only opened to Yosef Club members on the day of football games and I am in a state of absolute disgust that those people, who obviously rank Appalachian very high in their priority book because they donate some money to us, would leave such a mess behind at a school that they went to and love. I understand that some major tailgating went on, and all of that is wonderful, I just don’t understand how people can leave so much trash behind. It would be one thing if it was one group of people that left a bag of trash, but it wasn’t. It was half of the people that were in that parking lot. I just can not see how people who are of older age than us college students and you would hope more mature can not just pick up after themselves. If they leave the parking lot of a school that they attended and think so highly of a wreck, I just wonder how they leave their own homes or any other place that they come in contact with!!!
Austin Buck
ab41985@appstate.edu
Senior, Risk and Insurance
Wanted: respect
To the Editor:
   ("Be respectful of the culture your style portrays" Oct. 2) Did you even read your article before it was printed? It is the most ridiculous thing ever.
    You should have read up or researched or just asked someone about their dreads before you run around saying that dreads are “like a rats nest without shampoo and/or conditioner.” It’s obviously not good for your hair to dread it, but a lot of people that have dreads keep them clean and take good care of them. It’s not a style you can just do. Nice dreads are high maintenance.
    And your whole bit about Jewish people do not get tattoos of Buddah? I must be going to hell now, because I am a Christian and I have a tattoo of Buddah on my foot. A tattoo of a symbol of compassion inked onto my foot makes me a bad person to you.
    Come on, God, Allah, whatever you wanna call it is LOVE! Above everything else, god is love and god does not judge, unlike you. Just because someone thinks that dreads are cool and they’re not from Jamaica, and they probably have no clue who Haille Selassi is, or what he did, or where he came from does not make them disrespectful at all. So what if they don’t believe in rastafari. IT’S HAIR!
    I know what is disrespectful, “those with bare heads may want to present themselves as monks or Nazis.” You have GOT to be kidding me. Go ask some guy with a bald head if he is a Nazi. I hope he slaps you. You need to show some respect. I can’t believe they let you print that article, let alone write for the school paper. 
Erin Heuermann
Erinbree08@yahoo.com
Meth on the rise
To the Editor:
   Anna Oakes’ Oct. 2 [online] article addresses District Attorney Jerry Wilson’s “weapons of mass destruction” charges against small time methamphetamine cooks based on his assessment that existing penalties for meth lab offenses are too lenient. Many think these bizarre charges don’t fit the crime and are overly punitive for relatively low-level drug offenses.
    Less obvious are the deceptive political agenda and feckless manipulation driving events. Novel to our region, meth labs are commonplace elsewhere, the phenomenon gradually migrating from the west coast during the last decade. Thousands of small labs are seized annually in Midwestern states, notably Oklahoma and Missouri; recently Alabama and Tennessee have been heavily afflicted. Sharp regional outbreaks with dozens of busts, lately seen here, are ordinary occurrences in these locales. Determined enforcement, harsh punishment and shrill, overheated propaganda haven’t slowed the trend much, if any.
    Our enforcement officials have been quite aware of these issues and have long anticipated meth labs’ arrival, giving Wilson and colleagues ample time to request appropriate sentencing revisions and calmly educate the public. It appears they’ve forsaken such preparation in favor of awaiting the inevitable crisis, feigning surprise and capitalizing on public alarm to stampede lawmakers into hasty enactment of expensive, politically expedient remedies known to be marginally effective. In this context, equating drug manufacturing with terrorism is easily seen as merely a ploy to amplify the hysteria. Policy makers should denounce these theatrics and obtain sober disinterested advice from experienced sources not bound to predictable criminal justice perspectives.




     
Mett Ausley, Jr., MD
Lake Waccamaw NC
causley@cchospital.com
"Metal" reformation
To the Editor:
   "WASU DJs mix heavy metal, banter, Oct. 7) The bands listed in the article, while I speak nothing of quality, are not metal, beyond End of All. To those unfamiliar with the genre it’s difficult to place these things, and so the terms “metal” and “metalhead” are typically thrown around a little too casually.
    Speaking as owner of a good number of metal albums, ranging from Decapitated’s new-age brutal/technical death metal to At the Gates classic Swedish Melodic Thrash Metal album Slaughter of the Soul to Morbid Angel’s early masterpiece Blessed Are the Sick, I’ve come to know and appreciate the genre for what it is, and felt the urge to write due to a number of misconceptions about this music that are apparent in those unfamiliar.
    The term “nu-metal” is most fitting for many bands called metal. It would be an accurate description for Slipknot, Spineshank, 3 Quarters Dead, Korn, Linkin Park etc.
    Some tunnel graffiti brings up another issue. Metal has a nasty reputation, some of it deserved, some not. Please do not read too much into it, everyone. There IS an excellent Icon E in there, from Emperor's logo, in red, but plenty of unnecessary racism and immature religion-bashing as well. This is frustrating to those of us who enjoy metal and wish to distance ourselves from that.
    I can speak for much longer than anyone would like to read, but am merely writing to ask for a reform of the misuse of the terms "metal" and "metalhead" as well as misconceptions around the music.


R.C. Killian
rk53542@appstate.edu
A rewarding career
To the Editor:
    As students of a respected undergraduate program, you are gifted with the opportunity to pursue to nearly any imaginable career...
    I would recommend that you seriously consider attending a school of law. There are countless jobs available to those holding a Juris Doctor (J.D.) After passing the bar, you could eventually become a judge, a captain in the army, a firm lawyer, or even run for office.
    And while it is true that a J.D. is not required to become a politician, one finds that many of North Carolina’s leaders are indeed lawyers. Our governor attended N.C. Central Law, Senator Dole attended Harvard Law, and Senator Edwards attended Carolina Law (Chapel Hill).
    This is not to say that law school is right for everyone. It is a strenuously intellectual experience that would push you to the limits of your capacity, and the cost of tuition can be prohibitive. The best institutions receive thousands of applications above and beyond their seating limits ... entrance is competitive, and last season, more people applied than ever before.
    However, if you want a career that will demand excellence of the mind, an education that promotes critical thinking, and job that will reward (and compensate) you well ... you should seriously contemplate living law.

John T. Plecnik
Duke Law, Class of 2006
John.Plecnik@law.duke.edu
 
To the Editor:
  
Erin Heuermann
Erinbree08@yahoo.com
Ending hypocrisy
To the Editor:
   I wanted to thank you for publishing the letter by Ian Granucci. Finally someone using common sense and logic!
   Never mind the fact that our current and past presidents have used some of the very substances that have sent others to prison. And our elected officials conveniently exempt themselves from drug testing.
   Our “leaders” need to end this hypocrisy and start holding persons responsible for their actions. Not criminalizing them for what they put in to their bodies.
    Respectfully submitted for publication,





     
Scott Russ
Baton Rouge, La.
Stereotypes & labels
To the Editor:
    In response to Justin Butler’s Letter to the Editor (Oct. 7), I congratulate him for alienating himself and his beliefs by invalidating the very point he tried to make. By labeling Leslie Rasimas as ‘clueless white girl from the suburbs‚ you’ve successfully classified yourself as an angry, presumptuous racist.
    The simple truth is that we do attach style to a group. Whether it be Abercromie to frat boy, trench coat and black makeup to goth, or baggy jeans and bling to gangster, we define people by what they wear and dreadlocks are no exception.
    The point of the article was that people are sometimes clueless about the origins of their style, not an attack against Rastafarians or any other groups. If I were to come on campus dressed in a Japanese Kimono and, when asked, could not explain why, I think I might be laughed at or thought silly; this is exactly the response wearers get when they can't offer any viable explanation for wearing their hair that way. Personally, I see uninformed style as just another person blindly following a flock, pretending to be something they're not, or just wanting to fit in.‚
    And furthermore, there is, in all honesty, a big difference in wearing the new Steve Madden shoes and binding your hair in dreadlocks, especially when it goes unwashed for extended periods of time and other people have to see and smell it.

  


Jonathan Ogilvie
jo51340@appstate.edu
Senior, Creative Writing
A challenge issued
To the Editor:
    The Anthropology Department's stated mission is “to provide a comparative and holistic approach to the study of the human experience." They undercut this mission entirely by banding together with High Country Students for Peace and Justice to cosponsor an "educational series" on U.S. foreign policy entitled "Oil, Blood and Money II." This politically charged series (ironically one with a proper concept of neither peace nor justice) is filled with lecturers, films, and the occasional Ph. D. What is the goal of this series?
    Theoretically, it is to educate the ignorant. Practically, it is designed to preach to the converted. Implicitly, it will attempt to undercut the means by which humanity sustains its existence on this earth: objectivity, individualism, technology, and capitalism. How will it do this? By appearing to champion human progress and freedom while obliterating the foundation on which these concepts rest.
    I do not have the time, space, or desire to correct the errors that will be made by the intellectual thugs featured in this series.
    It would take a book to untangle the evasions, lies, and misrepresentations committed by Michael Moore alone. But it is within the scope of this letter to point out that the upcoming series cannot be characterized as either "holistic" or "comparative." As such, I invite the Anthropology Department to start putting their money where their collective mouth is; either stop claiming to offer a broad view of the human experience, or start integrating opposing ideas into lecture series in the future.


  


Brandon Byrd
bb47783@appstate.edu
ASU Objectivist Club
Be Respectful to the Culture Your Style Portrays
To the Editor:
    To imply that it’s disrespectful for a non-Rastafarian to knot their hair ignores thousands of years of history. Further, to imply that Rastafarians should take offense to non-Rastas wearing dreadlocks is absurd.
Dreads, whether worn for spiritual reasons or not, have been around since the dawn of time; but the Rastafarian movement didn’t begin until 1928. The first written documentation of dreads dates to 1800 B.C. in the Veda scriptures of India, and to this day dreadlocks are associated with followers of the God-figure Shiva. Before this, cavemen are thought to have worn knots. Certain Germanic tribes and even early Asian emperors wore them. Some ancient Egyptians, particularly pharaohs, had dreadlocks -- King Tut’s remain preserved to this day. Members, especially priests, of at least a half dozen African tribes also knot their hair. Naga Indians wear dreadlocks. Aborigines and New Guineans wear them. And the list goes on…
Rastas should only take offense to non-Rastas with dreads when those people claim to be of the faith when, in fact, they aren’t. It’s true that people shouldn’t portray “themselves as something they do not truly identify with.” However, you said it yourself -- none of the people interviewed purported to be Rastafarian. Simply having knots isn’t enough to associate someone with Rastafarianism, seeing how people of so many different cultures do it for so many different reasons. And there’s over 3700 years of history to prove it.



Kelly Cousino
kc56447
Animal testing is worth saving a human life
To the Editor:
    In response to Thursday's editorial, "Animal testing is worth saving a human life (Oct. 9)" A couple of corrections ... modern medicine can 'extend' lives, not 'save' them. And the notion that animal testing will produce medical miracles such that "... the human won't have do die" is ludicrous when carried to its logical extension.
    All humans die. Nothing can change that. Unfortunately, our modern philosophy that medicine can "cure" all ills has led, not to eternal life, but to a hyper-wealthy class of doctors and insurance agencies.
Modern medicine can not save you, but it can make sure that you die without any of your savings intact.
    Animal testing is inhumane, but not simply because of the damage done to the animals. The pain and trauma levied on the sick and elderly, and their families, through these so-called “miracle cures” can be just
as inhumane. Anyone who has seen a grandparent in ICU tugging listlessly at an endotracheal tube has experienced this. Because such sights are disturbing to robust, healthy Americans, the elderly in this country are often confined to nursing homes; sprawling institutions not unlike livestock farms, where people can be held at the edge of death for years, out of sight, until financial hardship brings about the inevitable.
    We don’t need to increase our life expectancy up into the hundreds. We need a rational re-examination of our approach to death as a culture, and ultimately an acceptance of euthanasia as a more desirable end than the hopeless quest for one more breath.
    After all, it’s good enough for our pets.



  


Eric Kesler
Junior, English
EK61102
Be Respectful to the Culture Your Style Portrays
To the Editor:
    Before Leslie Rasimas trashes any more students ("Be Respectful to the Culture Your Style Portrays," Oct. 2), let me point out a few things. I find it ridiculous how you can label everyone who has dreadlocks as Rasafarian, and then trash them for not being Rastafarian.
    You turn dreadlocks into a symbol of Rastafarianism by saying "Jewish people do not get tatoos of Buddha." How do you think Rastafarians feel when you reduce their religion to a hairstlye? I have just as much right to assume you are Irish because you said "bag o' goodies." It is a totally superficial stereotype and is detremental to both Rastafarians and students choosing to wear dreadlocks.



Brock Gordon
jg57301
Chancellor Search Committee forum
To the Editor:
    I was upset after reading about the Chancellor Search Committee forum. The choice of our chancellor is very important to me and for every person on this campus, even if they think so or not. The choice of a person that will be the representative of our university should be one that a majority of the population agrees upon, not just the committee's choice.
    I had not heard of any such forum until the article was published and I share Justin Pittman's feelings about the forum not being advertised enough. I am not a member of the SGA, however, I still would like to think that I have the opportunity to share in what will be a very important change on campus. I am glad that Ms. Johnson is taking on the responsibility to hear the students' opinions and I hope that the committee will get the point that the choice should not be held from the campus population.


  


Courtney Cooper
CC60164
Respectful to the culture your style portrays
To the Editor:
    Respectful to the culture your style portrays (Oct. 2)? Leslie, did you do any research into Rastafarianism and it's culture before you wrote your article? One stereotype that you left out about bald men would be "slave". Rastafarian's do not cut their hair because that's what the slave traders did when they captured blacks from Africa and Jamaica. The dreadlocks signify power and they believe in cutting your hair you become powerless, a slave.
    Your article states that people don't wash when they have dreadlocks.
    That's a misconception. Dreadlocks can be washed and a simple Google search on dread maintenance can enlighten you on how clean they can be.
    How should Christian's dress? Is there a dress code for Buddhists? Your ideas sound familiar to the ranting of Hitler's perfect society in which Jewish people wore a Star of David so that they could be recognized. I only bring this up because I feel your article spreads the same unaccepting ignorance of expression through dress and culture. Yes, it is true that people judge you by the clothes you wear. PEOPLE ARE WRONG. Albert Einstein (a Jew) would never comb his hair and reportedly was seen leaving his apartment without his pants. Our shallow society would judge this person as a homeless man or a crazy person. If your friend or sister got dreads would they not be the same funny, smart person except with dreadlocks? Please be a person who stops the cycle of stereotyping, labeling, and segregating instead of one who promotes it.


  


Robert F. Burke
Rb60161
ASU RA's pay makes up for lack of benefit
To the Editor:
    Upon reading the article "ASU RA's pay makes up for lack of benefits",
    I became very upset. Myself being an RA, I was perturbed by some of the aspects in the article. First of all, people who want to become RA's have to go through a long, grueling process of interviews, applications, and training. You are accepted based on your character, leadership skills, and a cumulative GPA. I am not saying that this is a downfall, but I think people fail to realize how much RA's actually go through. We have a lot of work on our shoulders, being RA's, students and people, and the article made it seem to appear that we didn't do anything and are only in it for the money. I actually didn't know that RA's got paid until after I was an accepted RA. What does this mean to me? All I can say is that I wish the article had gone into more detail about how much RA's actually do instead of how much we "complain" about benefits we don't get. You have to look at the hidden aspects of being an RA; You become a role-model to numerous residents, you learn leadership and organizational skills, and you gain respect for yourself and from others.
    Those benefits can't actually be obtained physically, and can't be written down under "RA benefits", but they are few of the many emotional benefits that will influence our lives forever.
    Thank you!



  


Amanda Mahaffee
6th floor White resident assistant
am54820
Respectful to the culture your style portrays
To the Editor:
   Tiffany's argument that the price of going out to eat will skyrocket if Boone legalizes liquor by the glass is just plain stupid! Last I knew, the menus of places like Macado's and Klondike were a far cry from that of Olive Garden and Red Lobster. The comparison of prices is weak. Liquor will surely bring in corporate restaurants who's standards for food quality and cleanliness are far higher than many of the locally restaurants. Take a look at the floors and ceilings of some of these independent restaurants some time if you doubt me. As for watered down liquor, this is extremely rare in the restaurant industry, especially with corporate restaurants. This practice is much more common in bars and clubs that do drink promotions to increase attendance. Liquor will not bring in bars and clubs because Boone doesn't allow bars which has nothing to do with whether or not Boone legalizes liquor by the glass.
    Again Tiffany's argument doesn't make much sense. In the end, if Liquor gets passed, the restaurants that come to Boone will create many more jobs than the independents could ever hope to, helping to generate that extra cash that Tiffany feels we will all need to buy overpriced and watered down liquor. Oh, and by the way, if Tiffany thinks $50 is cheap for a meal then mom and dad may be giving her too much money.



  


Nathan Lambert
Senior
Nl49182
Contact Us