Home arrow Opinion arrow Don’t get outFoxxed
   
   
Sunday, 22 November 2009
 
Your Voice
What form of travel do you plan on taking for the holiday break?
 





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Don’t get outFoxxed Print E-mail
Tuesday, 29 May 2007
Active Image
As a society, we put trust in our politicians to make decisions that best serve the American people – more specifically their constituency.

At least that’s the idea.

However, when one examines the voting record of U.S. Rep. Virginia
Foxx, a different idea comes to mind.


Foxx represents the fifth district of North Carolina, which includes Boone.


According to the U.S. Census, the fifth district is below the national average in both the number of people with a high school diploma and a bachelor’s degree, so it would only make sense that education – especially higher education – would be one of Foxx’s goals.



Furthermore, the area is slightly below the national average in terms of median family income, and it is three percentage points lower in the number of individuals living beneath the poverty line.

Thus, legislation that provides financial aid programs should be another goal.


Foxx’s voting record tells another story.


For example, in the Jan. 31 passage of a bill increasing the amount granted in the federal Pell Grant, Foxx voted against the bill.


In addition, Foxx voted against the College Student Relief Act on Jan. 17, a bill that amended the Higher Education Act of 1965 in order to reduce interest rates charged to undergraduate student borrowers.


The true irony of her higher education voting record is that she was an Appalachian State University professor from 1978 to 1985.


Foxx’s voting negligence does not stop at higher education. It extends to one of the hottest topics in America since the Vietnam War: the Iraqi War.


According to May results of a national Gallup Poll, most Americans support the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq using a timetable approach.


How does Foxx respond to the nation’s attitude?


She votes May 10 against legislation setting a 90-day withdrawal deadline and votes against funding the troops via a 60-day installment plan that included benchmarks.


According to Foxx’s press office, she voted against the bills because “the military is running out of money to fund our troops in Iraq.”


However, if there is not action to start pulling troops away from the front line, money will continue to be shipped off into the financial black hole that is Iraq.


Unfortunately, Foxx got her wish as Friday a $120-billion spending measure toward the Iraqi War was passed through Congress despite the fact that the legislation lacked a timetable.


Many criticized Democratic presidential hopefuls Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton for voting against the bill since it cuts off funding for the troops.


This is not the case.


Such a bill is not against troops, it is simply forcing legislation to have a plan so that we are not floundering in our Iraq strategy.


According to the Gallup Poll, the majority of Americans believe the war in Iraq was a mistake. Passing legislation without a timetable is simply furthering that mistake.


So what can we do? Many would say nothing.


While it may seem like nothing, there is grassroots approach already underway.


Protesters gather in front of Foxx’s office off Hwy. 105 Ext. on the Monday closest to the 19th of every month – the anniversary of the beginning of the war in Iraq.


This is just one example of what can be done from the bottom up.


I encourage everyone who is upset about these policies – both domestic and foreign – to take a stand and tell Foxx that she is not accurately representing our district.

Trackback(0)
Comments (1)Add Comment
So are the ones who voted for wrong also?
written by asuconserv, June 04, 2007
Foxx won her 2006 re-election with 57% of the vote. Obviously, she is representing the sound majority that trusts her positions on issue such as taxpayer subsidized education and the Iraq war. Her job is to represent the district that elected her, not a somewhat uninformed national opinion. You certainly have the right to disagree with her and should let her know by calling, writing, or emailing her office. But making claims that she doesn't represent the majority of her district is woefully inaccurate.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

Advertisement

 

© Copyright 1996 - 2008 The Appalachian | theapp.appstate.edu
Advertise with the ASU Student Media