Home
   
   
Thursday, 09 February 2012
 

We've Moved!

Now visit us at: www.TheAppalachianOnline.com

Old Archives will contine to be served from this address.


 


Recording industry versus downloading Print E-mail
Tuesday, 12 June 2007
Active Image
There was a time several years ago when music listeners truly expected the controversy over illegal downloading to die down by 2005.

At that time, those in power would’ve hopefully realized that, whether downloading is an ethical practice or not, it is also an unstoppable trend and should be legalized accordingly.

Here we are in 2007, and still the Recording Industry Association of America spends thousands of dollars citing 12 year olds as criminals for sharing something as intangible and personal as music.
 

All criticisms of the apparent greed and capitalism of the music industry aside, this is simply bad for business.

Why would you alienate your chief music-buying public by treating them as degenerates for listening to the same bands and artists you hope to promote?


Of course, the Recording Industry Association of America would like you to believe that you are hurting the artist by downloading their music.


Well, let’s take a look at the veracity of that statement for a moment.


The record industry is notorious for paying shockingly low royalties to its talent, and in fact most writers and visual artists make more from their respective publishers and galleries than professional musicians do.


Especially in the case of lesser-known bands on smaller independent labels, musicians see very little profit from the sales of their records, and occasionally even end up in debt to the label they record for.


Record labels also take huge chunks of their artists’ money in the form of promotion and legal fees.


While this is a necessary, and even helpful, aspect of the recording industry, it is also more money taken from the artist’s hands and into the pocket of the wealthy label executive.


The primary income a bands earns comes from endless touring, merchandise sales, and also commercial licensing, and what this does is force many bands opposed to endorsements into shilling
for say, Honda or Outback Steakhouse, in order to make enough money to survive.


This alienates fans of the band, who feel their favorite artists are “selling out” for notoriety.


In turn, as has often been argued, the publicity gained from downloading is often beneficial to getting bands heard by new fans, thus possibly even contributing to future album sales.


Such was the case with Baltimore hip-hop producer Danger Mouse, whose illicit mash-up of the Beatles and rapper Jay-Z on The Grey Album led him to a star career of producing for high-profile artists and band membership in popular acts such as Gnarls Barkley and Gorillaz.


In all honesty, who you’re hurting by not buying albums is the record label, which is why downloading lawsuits against the public are usually brought about by the record companies, rather than the artists themselves.


On the other hand, some feel that corporate entertainment chains such as FYE and Virgin Megastore
should lower astronomical prices for new CDs before they’ll begin buying albums again.


If these stores truly cared about losing money, then they could combat downloading effectively by lowering their prices, thus restoring customer confidence in their salesmanship and professionalism.


Finally, also notable is the fact that CD burning is entirely legal.


If downloading is seen as a crime by the government and the Recording Industry Association of America, then is it not illogical for CD burning to be fully endorsed by corporate America?


One could argue that if CD burning is acceptable by legal standards, then downloading should be as well.


At times one can’t help but wonder if the record labels have considered that perhaps their sales are down not because of losing purchases to illegal downloading, but because what they are presenting to the record-buying public is empty, mediocre pop that refuses to push the envelope of creative integrity whatsoever.


In any event, downloading is a truly unstoppable trend, and one that will eventually be made legal due to the sheer inability to police such a widespread and popular activity.


Until the record labels and record chains of America prove to their customers that they care about their patronage and pocketbook, downloading will continue, the labels and chains will lose yet more money, and the winner still remains the American music fan, no matter who else misses out in the end.
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

 

 

© Copyright 1996 - 2009 ASU Student Publications