Home arrow Opinion arrow Reader Forum
   
   
Sunday, 22 November 2009
 
Your Voice
What form of travel do you plan on taking for the holiday break?
 





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

Reader Forum Print E-mail
Tuesday, 04 November 2008

 Article misleads military influence

I was surprised to hear such a typically careful newspaper publish such a glaringly offensive comment in the Oct. 30 issue of The Appalachian in the “trafficking” article.

The article references the military’s “influence” in the human trafficking “scene,” and makes the allusion that it’s a “dirty little secret” and that anywhere with a military presence automatically encourages human trafficking for sexual purposes.

 I’m a military daughter, fiancé, sister, and friend, and this is incredibly offensive.

I will agree, it’s commonly accepted knowledge that members of the military can be promiscuous, but this doesn’t mean they are going to go looking for immigrants forced to come to their town to “service their needs.”

Unfortunately, there is an abundance of women who are U.S. citizens who have been forced into, or alternatively, chose this lifestyle.  The military does not encourage human trafficking.  If you had thought to interview any member of the armed forces, and asked them questions regarding this topic, they would be appalled.

Don’t present the military as animals or sex starved maniacs. They’re my brother, my fiancé, my uncle, and my friend. Take the trouble to find out the facts and opinions of those you’re going to write about.

Amy Jones
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
senior social work major
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

Advertisement

 

© Copyright 1996 - 2008 The Appalachian | theapp.appstate.edu
Advertise with the ASU Student Media