|
The election of the 44th President of the United States has provided a refreshing respite from the usual chorus of groans associated with discussion of the executive office.
A firm Obama supporter, I am usually in accordance with his notions of how to bring about change, salvage our nation and create an entire wardrobe out of five suits and an undetermined number of ties.
Unfortunately, in a
matter slightly less superfluous than how to dress for success, I find
myself seriously disagreeing with the tastefully clad President.
While
campaigning, Obama stated that if elected, he would overturn the ban on
federal funding for embryonic stem cell research instated by the Bush
administration.
Although
I adore the newly elected President and the photos of him attempting to
outplay Tyler Hansbrough, I can hardly concur with this decision.
Stem
cells from a human embryo have the capacity to grow into any human
tissue, and are therefore invaluable to those who believe they can
exploit this capacity and use it to cure innumerable diseases.
Unfortunately, to extract stem cells, it is necessary to destroy the embryo.
The
human embryo is a staggering entity, a vessel capable of creating a
human being, and it is unimaginable that we would sacrifice the
opportunity to manifest that latent life in the name of an immature
science.
Those
who condone this experimentation claim to be doing so in the name of
leaps and bounds in the medical field, and having experienced my fair
share of bizarre ailments and awkward anomalies, I understand the
recent arms race for the cure.
Yet, in
spite of the inconveniences and losses engendered by maladies, I simply
refuse to believe the ends justify the means in this case.
Stem
cells can be extracted from other parts of the body without serious
repercussions, including the umbilical cord, and a slightly painful
bone marrow procedure.
These
aged stem cells are referred to as adult stem cells, slightly less
versatile in their abilities to form tissues; these comprise a less
developed area of the science.
Yet, in
the sober name of science, embryonic stem cells are preferable to those
procured from adults, and therefore, one must not blink an apathetic
eye at the thought of the irreconcilable transaction.
Admired
for their virgin state and plasticity, embryonic cells are the most
coveted of the extracted stem cells, but wouldn’t the art of acquiring
and acclimating adult stem cells be improved by the increased
dedication of funds and research that are otherwise concentrated on the
uncouth embryonic variety?
The
treacherous ground researchers are treading seems to be a slippery
slope that could lead to unimaginable consequences, and there is no
promise of success.
In fact, many mice have rejected the tissues they receive and suffered from tumors that have worsened their nerve damage.
It seems
that researchers are meddling with the manifestation of faultless
embryos to vainly pursue a costly and uncharted endeavor.
Stephanie Straubel, a freshman French major from Chapel Hill, is an opinion writer.
Trackback(0)
|