|
Tuesday, 03 February 2009 |
|
Confusion discourages research support
While I was very interested to see the opinion piece in the paper on stem cells, there were a few misconceptions I believe need to be clarified.
While I agree with Patrick Babcock that stem cell research is very important, I was disappointed that he undercut his own argument by saying stem cells come from “aborted fetuses.” Stem cells do not come from fetuses.
“Fetus” is the medical term used for a baby from two or three months of development until birth.
Stem Cells on the other hand come from embryos which refers to the fertilized egg from conception to about two months.
While
I’m sure Mr. Babcock didn’t attempt to misconstrue these terms on
purpose, it’s misconceptions such as these that might make people not
support this necessary branch of research.
Sophie E. Harton
sophomore English major
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Trackback(0)
|
Check your mirror to see whose confusing the issue. The depths of embryonic stem cell research will and already has lead our civilations into fetal farming and cloning. And given the zero therapies created so far, what's the point? Many groups overseas have abandoned embryonic stem cells for the ripe and growing developments with adult stem cells and cord blood stem cells. Why are you and others so hell bent on destroying life for nothing?