Home
   
   
Sunday, 22 November 2009
 
Your Voice
What form of travel do you plan on taking for the holiday break?
 






Lost Password?
No account yet? Register

600 words with Anne Baker Print E-mail
Thursday, 26 March 2009
Active Image

Stick figures explain current economic state

Being a constant connoisseur of pretty much any media source out there, I try to keep up with the continuous coverage of the state of the economy today.

Yet I have come to the conclusion that I’m hopelessly confused—and the more I try to understand the situation, the more I feel lost.

I’m not really sure what the bailout numbers are up to now. I’m not totally comfortable trying to explain stock market statistics to those who ask. To be completely honest, I’m not sure I even understand what sparked this financial crisis to begin with.

I was somewhat ashamed to admit that at first—but then I realized I was not alone.

Does anyone really know about our economy in-depth anymore? It seems like the articles I read now in

The New York Times, Time magazine and on CNN.com provide readers with more and more vague terms that are not really explained to the fullest extent.

I find myself wallowing in a pile of words like “subprime mortgages,” “economic health,” “ballooning deficits” and “recession and depression” and I’m not quite sure how to define all those.

Anna Quindlen wrote in the latest issue of Newsweek that John McCain received criticism on the campaign trail for saying he did not understand economics the way he should.

I remember thinking at first I would probably never admit this to the people who were about to determine the course of the presidential election.

On second thought, though, I appreciated his honesty.

“[McCain’s] real sin wasn’t only ignorance, but also candor, combined with the suspicion that many of his colleagues were no better versed in the subject than he was,” Quindlen said.

She continues, “If the current repression—worse than a recession, not quite a depression—can teach us anything, it’s that you can’t proceed knowledgeably, in terms of personal finance or political judgment, in an area you don’t really know much about.”

In a class this week, one of my professors showed me something with the title, “Subprime Primer: stick figures explain economic collapse.”

The Subprime Primer is a 45-slide presentation completely made of stick figures that explain the present economic meltdown “as the world slides into depression.”

If you haven’t seen it yet, definitely take the time to check it out—really, it explains the financial crisis better than anything I have seen in any major media source to date.

The presentation begins with two stick figures at Ace Mortgage Brokers, one of who wishes to buy a house, but has not saved any money for a downpayment.

The other figure responds with, “Sure! Since the value of your house will always go up, we don’t need downpayments anymore!”

It is, as expected, a downward spiral from there. The end result really isn’t any end result at all—just two stick figures, one from the Norwegian Village Pension Fund arguing on the phone about a lack of monthly payments, and one from the RSG Investment Bank providing his simple, three-word explanation saying they messed up.

It is possible to understand this financial crisis if the research is done in the right place, and it is our responsibility to do this research because it is only when we understand the bailout bill and everything around it that we can hold the government accountable.

“Sometimes the most useful thing you can do is admit what you don’t know, because what you don’t know will hurt you,” Quindlen writes in the article. “By all means, trash AIG. But it would be best if you understood exactly what they’d done in the first place.”
Trackback(0)
Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

Advertisement

 

© Copyright 1996 - 2008 The Appalachian | theapp.appstate.edu
Advertise with the ASU Student Media