Home
   
   
Thursday, 29 July 2010
 

We've Moved!

Now visit us at: www.TheAppalachianOnline.com

Old Archives will contine to be served from this address.


 


New-age relationships complicate love Print E-mail
Tuesday, 17 October 2006
by Lindsay TIGAR
Intern Lifestyles Reporter

The lyrics of Seth Swirsky’s song “Instant Pleasure” as performed by Rufus Wainwright sound loud and clear on Appalachian’s campus, “I don’t want someone to love me, just give me sex whenever I want it, ‘cause all I ask for is instant pleasure.”

Have college students become more concerned with instant pleasure than a meaningful relationship?
It seems the words “sex” or “hook-up” don’t coincide with the famous four-letter word love anymore. So maybe the new “relationship” of today’s generation is “friends-with-benefits.”

“I think that love and commitment should be part of a relationship before sex comes into the picture,” Madeline Gordon, a freshmen psychology major said. “I don’t think it’s right for people to go around randomly hooking-up.”

A friends-with-benefits relationship could be defined as a special type of friendship between two people where sex is involved but commitment is not. Or in college terms, the person you call up when you’re feeling lonely.

However, random hook-ups are common on college campuses.

According to www.divorcepeers.com, 49 percent of college students have had a sexual hook-up and never saw their partner again.

Often times in this type of relationship, one person gets attached, though commitment is not supposed to be present. And most of the time, the female gets the wrong end of the bargain.

“There are gender differences on how much emotional commitment there is in sexual encounters,” Doris Bazzini, psychology department general experimental program director, said. “Males are able to separate emotional commitments and females prefer that sexual partner is someone they have an emotional connection with.”

Thus, if a female establishes this connection within a “friends-with-benefits” relationship and she isn’t received on those feelings by her male counterpart, it ends with heartache. And for the guy, he successfully had and ended another typical college relationship.

Even if a female decides she wants to participate in a friends-with-benefits relationship and ignores her desire for an “emotional connection,” will other males view her as unworthy girlfriend material because of her past behaviors?

“Society promotes labels on genders,” Bazzini said. “Traditionally, if a woman sleeps around, she gets a bad reputation. On the other hand, guys have been encouraged and even rewarded for having multiple sex partners.”

People should realize that although waiting until marriage for sexual intercourse may be outdated, waiting on a meaningful relationship is not.

Most of the time, having a friends-with-benefits relationship does not climax (no pun intended) into anything beneficial.

Some may argue that their friends-with-benefits relationship was meaningful, but truthfully the only significant aspect was between the sheets.
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)Add Comment
Virginity outdated?
written by asuconserv, October 19, 2006
Only one question - how has saving sex unitl marriage become outdated? Seems as though all that heartache (and STDs, unplanned pregnancies, rejection) could be avoided entirely simply by placing one's virture above one's carnal desires.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

 

 

© Copyright 1996 - 2009 ASU Student Publications